Abortion

so we've all come to a sort of agreement? Is this debate practically over then? Weird..........I dont think I've ever seen that happen yet.

 

No, it's just that I agree on somethings but not all. I still believe in Pro-Choice.

 

okay, and I respect your opinion. Just as I ask you all to respect mine. Like I keep saying, abortin is a touchy topic.

 

Yes, it really is, it mainly depends on the environment you're in if you ask me. If you say, "I believe in the choice of someone," in a very religious area of America (usually the Southern states, sorry to generalize", then you're a son-of-a-bitch. Then if you say, "I believe that it's wrong and all life is sacred," in a more rational-based area, then you're a son-of-a-bitch too. Also, it's almost like the question, "Which came first? The chicken or the egg?". Who's opinion matters, the fetus's good-interest, or the barrer's good-interest?

 

Who says their child is a nusance? What parent? Hm? All "good" parents view their children as the most important thing they in a sense "own". Only lazy parents dont like their kids. They need to responsibility for their actions. They had un-protected sex. They take the chance of getting a kid.

 

Exactly, I'm getting sick of this crap with "It's your baby, and you know it." Especially with people that are economically-inferior (meaning they don't have the money for that kind of thing).

 

Exactly. Then they shouldnt have sex, because they arent responsible enough to have earned that "gift" in a sense. They dont have the money, they dont deserve sex.

 

No, they can have sex, but really get a damn condem so you don't have to yell about the two blue bars.

 

Yes, exactly. If they can afford that, then they deserve sex...haha.

 

Yeah, then they do. You'd think by now that if you have like 5,000 kids and your poor. You might get, oh I dunno poorer?

 

HAHA, yeah...
plus condoms are cheep.

 

Yes, they are, so why not use them. God damn it.

 

haha......dont go damning condemns now, or we'll all be poor.
XD

 

Oh shut-up, now we're spamming, lol.

 

yeah, okay. So we've come to sort of agreement yet again? good.

 

Yeah, agreement reached. . .again.

 

That term always bugged me. There is no such thing as protected sex. If there was, then the protection would be for STD's. Un-protected sex is a term coined by liberals (similar to political correctness) to make it seem like a baby is a diesase. Honestly, you don't 'protect' yourself from a baby. You do things to prevent a baby from being born, but there is no protection because there is no danger in sex (yes, you can easily flip that last statement against me. I just said something really broad. I'd rather not get into the details to prove me wrong about danger in sex.).

 

sex is overall bad for people who arent ready for it. And your protecting yourself from the new life that would result in a child's birth. Not that that life would be bad. Its just you not ready yet.

 

It's not protection though. There's nothing bad about having a child, so there's nothing to be protected from. If children were to be a danger, then yes, it would be protection. But since they're not a danger, it's not protection.

 

I get your point, but for people who arent ready for a kid...it is a type of danger.